First it is an estimate So we have all had some expose to this training zone thingy I always wondered what it meant, and how it was calculated when looking at the results of a medical or at a gym. Recently I had the fortune of being given a Polar watch to monitor my exercise, and this got me digging about these zones, since I never seemed to be it the correct one. After a few searches and forum reads I found these articles below: Ten reasons why “220 Minus Age” gets a failing grade: . Which stated that: "The equation was created in the early 1970’s by scientists Fox, Naughton, and Haskell who intended it to be a rough formulation and not meant to be representative of the entire population. All subject in the studies referenced were under 55 years of age and male. Although the equation has become accepted and the standard in the literature and is used widely in clinical and fitness settings, its validity is uncertain." The Myth Of "Maximum Heart Rate = 220-Age , and h...
Just some opinions and things I have committed to virtual prosperity just in case UGAF